The intermediate value theorem makes definite an idea that may seem intuitively obvious if we rely on everyday experience.
For example, if the temperature of the air in a room warms from $$−3°C to $$18°C after a heater is turned on, it is not difficult to accept the proposition that there must be a moment when the temperature is exactly $$0°C.
This idea applies whenever there is a process of continuous change. It would not be true, however, if the cold air in the room could be suddenly replaced by warm air so that the temperature $$0°C is skipped.
In the long process of making the calculus, as invented by Newton and Leibniz, rigorous, the intermediate value idea had to be made explicit and it had to be given a proof. The proof depends on an understanding of continuity and on the least upper bound property of the real numbers.
Roughly speaking, we say a function is continuous over an interval if for any small change in the domain variable there corresponds a small change in the function value. That is, there is never a jump in the function value when the domain variable changes by a tiny amount.
Ordered sets, including the real numbers, have the property that whenever a set has an upper bound it must have a least upper bound.
Consider, for example, the set $${x: x2<2}. The number $$1.5 is an upper bound for this set because it is greater than any number in the set. Similarly, the number $$1.45 is an upper bound because $$1.452=2.1025>2. The least upper bound property asserts that there exists an upper bound, which we call $$√2, that is less than all other upper bounds.
The intermediate value theorem says that if $$f is a continuous function with values $$f(a) and $$f(b) where $$a<b, then for any number $$n between $$f(a) and $$f(b) there is a number $$c between $$a and $$b such that $$f(c)=n.
The proof begins with the special case $$f(a)<0 and $$f(b)>0 and we show that there exists $$a<c<b such that $$f(c)=0.
By the continuity of $$f, if $$f(a)<0, it must be possible to find numbers $$w near $$a such that $$f(a+w)<0. The set of all such numbers $$w is bounded above and so it must have a least upper bound.
Call this least upper bound $$c and consider $$f(c). The value $$f(c) cannot be negative because then $$c would not be an upper bound. Additionally, $$f(c) cannot be positive because then $$c would not be the least upper bound. We are left with the only remaining possibility, that $$f(c)=0.
To move from the special case to the more general theorem, we construct a new continuous function $$g(x)=f(x)−n. Given that $$f(a)<n<f(b), it follows that $$f(a)−n<0<f(b)−n. That is, $$g(a)<0<g(b).
By the previous argument, we know that there exists $$c such that $$g(c)=0. So, $$f(c)−n=0 and hence, $$f(c)=n, as required.
If $$f(x) is a function that is continuous over the interval $$[a,b], then for any number $$n between $$f(a) and $$f(b) there is a number $$c such that $$a<c<b and $$f(c)=n.
One immediate implication of the intermediate value theorem is that it gives us a way to determine whether a continuous function has a zero in a given interval. Notice that if the sign of $$f(a) is different to the sign of $$f(b), then there must be some function value between $$f(a) and $$f(b) that is exactly equal to $$0. There will then be a corresponding $$x-value for this function value that we call the zero of the function.
If $$f(x) is a function that is continuous over the interval $$[a,b], and if $$f(a) and $$f(b) have opposite signs, then there exists at least one value $$c such that $$a<c<b and $$f(c)=0.
A certain quantity varies with time according to the rule $$x(t)=t3−2t2+1. It is clear that $$x(1)=0, but we wonder whether there are other values of $$t such that $$x(t)=0.
We choose some values for $$t. Say, $$t=−1, $$t=0.5, $$t=1.5, and $$t=2, and we calculate $$x(t) in each case.
$$t | $$−1 | $$0.5 | $$1.5 | $$2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
$$x(t) | $$−2 | $$0.625 | $$−0.125 | $$1 |
By the intermediate value theorem, we see that the function $$x(t) has a zero between $$t=−1 and $$t=0.5, another between $$0.5 and $$1.5 (which we already knew about), and another between $$t=1.5 and $$t=2.
We conclude that there is at least three zeros in the interval between $$t=−1 and $$t=2.
Consider the polynomial $$P(x)=4x2−8x+2. Dylan would like to know if it has a real zero between $$x=1 and $$x=2.
Find $$P(1).
Find $$P(2).
What conclusion can Dylan make about $$P(x) between $$x=1 and $$x=2 using the intermediate value theorem?
There are no real zeros between $$x=1 and $$x=2.
Dylan cannot conclude anything about the zeros of $$P(x).
There is exactly one real zero between $$x=1 and $$x=2.
There is at least one real zero between $$x=1 and $$x=2.
Consider the polynomial $$P(x)=4x3−x2+7x+7. Sharon would like to know if it has a real zero between $$x=−0.8 and $$x=−0.7.
Find $$P(−0.8) to one decimal place.
Find $$P(−0.7) to one decimal place.
What conclusion can Sharon make about $$P(x) between $$x=−0.8 and $$x=−0.7 using the intermediate value theorem?
There is exactly one real zero between $$x=−0.8 and $$x=−0.7
She cannot conclude anything about the zeros of the function.
There is at least one real zero between $$x=−0.8 and $$x=−0.7
There are no real zeros between $$x=−0.8 and $$x=−0.7
Consider the polynomial $$P(x)=2x3−8x2+6x+6. Yuri would like to know if it has a real zero between $$x=2.5 and $$x=2.6.
Find $$P(2.5) to one decimal place.
Find $$P(2.6) to one decimal place.
What conclusion can Yuri make about $$P(x) between $$x=2.5 and $$x=2.6 using the intermediate value theorem?
There is exactly one real zero between $$x=2.5 and $$x=2.6.
There is at least one real zero between $$x=2.5 and $$x=2.6.
There are no real zeros between $$x=2.5 and $$x=2.6.
He cannot conclude anything about the zeros of $$P(x).